WASHINGTON — Legal professional Common William P. Barr will journey to Capitol Hill on Tuesday for his first congressional testimony in more than a year, and lawmakers are ready to press for explanations on the federal response to nationwide protests of police killings of Black Individuals and the dealing with of prison instances involving President Trump’s allies.

The listening to earlier than the Home Judiciary Committee is definite to be tense and certain one of many ultimate congressional oversight showdowns of Mr. Trump’s first time period. Mr. Barr plans to return out swinging. In a ready opening assertion launched Monday night time, he aggressively defended the federal response to the protests and accused Democrats of demonizing him as a result of he believed the Trump-Russia investigation was misguided.

The socially distant listening to begins at 10 a.m. Right here’s what to anticipate.

Democrats are ready to accuse Mr. Barr, the nation’s high regulation enforcement officer, of constructing overtly political selections to assist Mr. Trump. However their most urgent examples would be the federal response to nationwide protests after the killing of George Floyd in May while he was in police custody in Minneapolis.

The lawyer basic seems to have performed a main position in utilizing federal brokers to violently clear protesters from Lafayette Sq. close to the White Home final month earlier than a photograph alternative for Mr. Trump in entrance of a church. Although the White Home initially stated Mr. Barr had ordered the clearance, he later stated he had not given a “tactical” order. Both manner, Democrats had been furious over his presence and have come to see Mr. Barr as a key obstacle to overhauls of policing that take pleasure in broad public help.

Extra lately, he has turn into a face of the Trump administration’s pledge to surge federal brokers into Democratic-led cities like Portland, Ore.; Chicago; and Kansas Metropolis, Mo., the place, the White Home says, protests have descended into violence, together with towards federal buildings. The federal intervention — the small print of which stay hazy — is rapidly turning into one other flash level within the monthslong cultural reckoning over systemic racism, and it seems to be a key marketing campaign technique by Mr. Trump who’s attempting to stoke a way that Democrats are main the nation into chaos.

Republicans plan to make use of a lot of their allotted time to buck up Mr. Barr, whom they see as holding the road towards protesters they accuse of focusing on the police and federal property whereas utilizing Mr. Floyd’s title as cowl.

However the lawyer basic appears unlikely to wish a lot assist. In his ready remarks, he warned that “violent rioters and anarchists have hijacked authentic protests to wreak mindless havoc and destruction” in locations like Portland, Ore.

“We must always all be capable of agree that there is no such thing as a place on this nation for armed mobs that search to ascertain autonomous zones past authorities management, or tear down statues and monuments that law-abiding communities selected to erect, or to destroy the property and livelihoods of harmless enterprise homeowners,” he deliberate to say.

His feedback had been the newest try by federal officers to attract extra consideration to vandals’ nightly bids to break federal buildings in Portland, accusing native police of doing little to cease them. Metropolis officers have accused federal agents of being heavy-handed and said their presence reinvigorated tensions that had been subsiding.

Mr. Barr was additionally ready to testify that the aftermath of Mr. Floyd’s demise had led to “demonizing police” and accusations of systemic racism in regulation enforcement. That view is an “oversimplification,” he’ll say, of a extra advanced mixture of issues that immediate distrust within the police by individuals of colour.

Home Democrats have sought to press Mr. Barr on his dealing with of the Russia report by the particular counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, for greater than a 12 months. They’ll lastly have their probability.

A federal choose has stated that in summarizing the report himself weeks earlier than releasing it, Mr. Barr put ahead a “distorted” and “deceptive” account that torqued public understanding of it in a manner that favored Mr. Trump. Democrats felt on the time that these distortions openly helped shield Mr. Trump politically from doable impeachment — an accusation Mr. Barr denies.

Since then, the lawyer basic has directed a prison prosecutor to scrutinize the F.B.I. inquiry into the Trump marketing campaign’s ties to Russia and stepped in to reverse key prosecutorial selections stemming from the investigation.

Particularly, Democrats will ask about his intervention to recommend a shorter prison sentence for Mr. Trump’s longtime buddy Roger J. Stone Jr. on seven felony crimes — a sentence Mr. Trump has since commuted — and to drop charges towards the previous nationwide safety adviser Michael T. Flynn though he had pleaded responsible.

The Judiciary Committee heard testimony from a prosecutor on the Stone case last month accusing division leaders of adjusting a sentencing advice for Mr. Stone for “political causes.” A second whistle-blower at that session additionally accused Mr. Barr of ordering antitrust investigations to harass marijuana sellers in states which have legalized the substance and to scrutinize California’s emissions cope with automakers after Mr. Trump attacked it.

Mr. Barr is ready to testify that he acted “with out partisan issues” and that Democrats’ hatred of Mr. Trump has blinded them to abuses by regulation enforcement and intelligence officers. (He didn’t tackle the instances particularly in his ready opening assertion.)

“Ever since I made it clear that I used to be going to do all the pieces I may to resolve the grave abuses concerned within the bogus ‘Russiagate’ scandal, most of the Democrats on this committee have tried to discredit me by conjuring up a story that I’m merely the president’s factotum who disposes of prison instances in keeping with his directions,” Mr. Barr deliberate to say.

He has lengthy been a critic of regulation enforcement and intelligence officers’ makes an attempt to grasp Russia’s efforts to tilt the 2016 election in Mr. Trump’s favor and whether or not any Trump associates conspired.

Mr. Mueller’s report stated that Russia favored Mr. Trump and that his marketing campaign welcomed the interference and anticipated to profit from it, however that investigators discovered inadequate proof to deliver prison conspiracy fees.

Mr. Barr will even say that Mr. Trump has by no means tried to “intrude” in his selections, giving him “full freedom” to do what he thinks is true.

Republicans have cheered on Mr. Barr as he took steps to discredit the Russia investigation. On Tuesday, they are going to be fishing for extra clues about the place he’s going.

Mr. Barr appointed a prison prosecutor, John H. Durham, to guide the scrutiny and has repeatedly hinted at doable indictments and will present new particulars. He has suggested that he doesn’t consider longstanding division coverage towards taking actions that might have an effect on elections ought to apply to Mr. Durham’s work this fall and that he worries federal brokers unfairly and dangerously focused Mr. Trump and his marketing campaign.

Within the meantime, Republican lawmakers are prone to ask for Mr. Barr’s ideas on a raft of recently declassified case files that they argue present F.B.I. brokers had been counting on shoddy overseas data to undertake key investigative actions into Mr. Trump’s associates.

Mr. Mueller’s investigators decided that Mr. Trump’s marketing campaign welcomed Moscow’s assist in 2016 however discovered inadequate proof to cost any marketing campaign officers or Trump associates with conspiring with the interference by a hostile overseas energy.

With states getting ready for file numbers of voters to forged ballots this fall by mail due to the coronavirus pandemic, Mr. Barr has offered key backup to Mr. Trump’s claims of rampant fraud. Democrats concern their feedback are supposed to or will at the least have the impact of suppressing voter turnout or limiting entry to the poll field.

In an interview with Fox News final month, Mr. Barr stated widespread vote by mail “opens the floodgates to fraud,” together with by a overseas energy.

“Proper now, a overseas nation may print up tens of 1000’s of counterfeit ballots, and be very exhausting for us to detect which was the appropriate and which was the incorrect poll,” Mr. Barr stated. He made similar comments to The New York Times.

“By way of overseas affect, there are a variety of overseas international locations that might simply make counterfeit ballots, put names on them, ship them in,” he stated.

Like Mr. Trump, the lawyer basic has not offered proof to again up his claims, however has largely spoken in hypotheticals concerning the insecurity of mailboxes.

Consultants say that tampering with ballots is nearly impossible due to how they’re printed and tracked. Many states have been conducting elections by mail for years with none main safety issues or widespread fraud.