A short historical past of the previous 4 months in America:

Consultants: Don’t rush to reopen, this isn’t over.

Donald Trump: LIBERATE!

Covid-19: Wheee!

Trump officers: Right here’s our opposition research on Anthony Fauci.

And we’re now confronted with an agonizing selection: Can we reopen colleges, creating dangers of an additional viral explosion, or can we preserve kids house, with extreme unfavourable results on their studying?

None of this needed to occur. Different nations caught with their lockdowns lengthy sufficient to scale back infections to charges a lot decrease than these prevailing right here; Covid-19 dying charges per capita within the European Union are solely a 10th these in america — and falling — whereas ours are rising quick. Because of this, they’re able to reopen colleges pretty safely.

And the expertise of the Northeast, the primary main epicenter of the U.S. pandemic, exhibits that we may have achieved one thing comparable right here. Demise charges are way down, though nonetheless larger than in Europe; on Saturday, for the primary time since March, New York Metropolis reported zero Covid-19 deaths.

Would an extended lockdown have been economically sustainable? Sure.

It’s true that sturdy social distancing necessities led to excessive unemployment and harm many companies. However even America, with its ramshackle social security web, was in a position to present sufficient catastrophe aid — don’t name it stimulus! — to guard most of its residents from extreme hardship.

Thanks largely to expanded unemployment advantages, poverty didn’t soar throughout the lockdown. By some measures it might even have gone down.

True, there have been holes in that security web, and many individuals did undergo. However we may have patched these holes. Sure, emergency aid prices some huge cash, however we are able to afford it: The federal authorities has been borrowing enormous sums, however rates of interest have remained close to historic lows.

Put it this fashion: At its most extreme, the lockdown appears to have decreased G.D.P. by a little over 10 percent. Throughout World Struggle II, America spent greater than 30 p.c of G.D.P. on defense, for greater than three years. Why couldn’t we take in a a lot smaller value for a couple of months?

So doing what was essential to convey the coronavirus underneath management would have been annoying, however solely possible.

However that was the street not taken. As a substitute, many states not solely rushed to reopen, they reopened stupidly. As a substitute of being handled as an inexpensive, efficient strategy to struggle contagion, face masks grew to become a entrance within the tradition battle. Actions that posed an apparent danger of feeding the pandemic went unchecked: Massive gatherings have been permitted, bars reopened.

And the price of these events and open bars extends past the hundreds of Individuals who can be killed or undergo everlasting well being injury on account of Covid-19’s resurgence. The botched reopening has additionally endangered one thing that, in contrast to ingesting in teams, can’t be suspended with out doing long-run injury: in-person schooling.

Some actions maintain up pretty nicely when moved on-line. I think that there can be rather a lot fewer individuals flying cross-country to stare at PowerPoints than there have been pre-Covid, even as soon as we lastly beat this virus.

Training isn’t a kind of actions. We now have overwhelming affirmation of one thing we already suspected: For a lot of, maybe most college students there isn’t any substitute for truly being in a classroom.

However rooms full of scholars are potential Petri dishes, even when the younger are much less more likely to die from Covid-19 than the outdated. Different nations have managed to reopen colleges relatively safely — however they did so with a lot decrease an infection charges than at the moment prevail in America, and with satisfactory testing, which we nonetheless don’t have in lots of sizzling spots.

So we’re now going through a horrible, pointless dilemma. If we reopen in-person schooling, we danger feeding an out-of-control pandemic. If we don’t, we impair the event of thousands and thousands of American college students, inflicting long-term injury on their lives and careers.

And the explanation we’re on this place is that states, cheered on by the Trump administration, rushed to permit massive events and reopen bars. In an actual sense America drank away its kids’s future.

Now what? At this level there are most likely as many infected Americans as there have been in March. So what we ought to be doing is admitting that we blew it, and doing a extreme lockdown over again — and this time listening to the specialists earlier than reopening. Sadly, it’s now too late to keep away from disrupting schooling, however the sooner we take care of this the earlier we are able to get our society again on monitor.

However we don’t have the type of leaders we want. As a substitute, we now have the likes of Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis, Florida’s governor, politicians who refuse to hearken to specialists and by no means admit having been improper.

So whereas there have been a couple of grudging coverage changes, the principle response we’re seeing to colossal coverage failure is a hysterical try to shift the blame. Some officers are attempting to blacken Dr. Fauci’s repute; others are diving into unhinged conspiracy theories.

Because of this, the outlook is grim. This pandemic goes to worsen earlier than it will get higher, and the nation will undergo everlasting injury.

The Instances is dedicated to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed below are some tips. And right here’s our e mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Comply with The New York Instances Opinion part on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.